lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c904f967-a536-5398-dc48-8adb4866ef51@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:59 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, amine.kherbouche@...nd.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        "bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] bridge: learn dst metadata in FDB

On 17/08/17 15:10, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:51:12PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 17/08/17 14:39, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 17/08/17 14:03, David Lamparter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:38:06PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> [cut]
>>>>> and hitting the fast path for everyone in a few different places for a
>>>>> feature that the majority will not use does not sound acceptable to
>>>>> me. We've been trying hard to optimize it, trying to avoid additional
>>>>> cache lines, removing tests and keeping special cases to a minimum. 
>>>>
>>>> skb->dst is on the same cacheline as skb->len.
>>>> fdb->md_dst is on the same cacheline as fdb->dst.
>>>> Both will be 0 in a lot of cases, so this should be two null checks on
>>>> data that is hot in the cache.  Are you sure this is an actual problem?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure - no, I haven't benchmarked it, but I don't see skb->len being on
>>> the same cache line as _skb_refdst assuming 64 byte cache lines.
>>
>> I should've been clearer - that obviously depends on the kernel config, but
>> in order for them to be in the same line you need to disable either one of 
>> conntrack, bridge_netfilter or xfrm, these are almost always enabled (at
>> least in all major distributions).
> 
> Did I miscount somewhere?  This is what I counted:
> offs    size
> 00      16      next/prev/other union bits
> 16      8       sk
> 24      8       dev
> 32	32      cb (first 32 bytes)
> ---- boundary @ 64
> 64      16      cb (last 16 bytes)
> 80      8       _skb_refdst
> 88      8       destructor
> 96      8 (0)   sp
> 104     8 (0)   _nfct
> 112     8 (0)   nf_bridge
> 120     4       len
> 124     4       data_len
> ---- boundary @ 128
> 128     2       mac_len
> 130     2       hdr_len
> 
> 
> -David
> 
What kernel ?

pahole -C sk_buff 

struct sk_buff {
	union {
		struct {
			struct sk_buff * next;           /*     0     8 */
			struct sk_buff * prev;           /*     8     8 */
			union {
				ktime_t tstamp;          /*           8 */
				u64 skb_mstamp;          /*           8 */
			};                               /*    16     8 */
		};                                       /*          24 */
		struct rb_node     rbnode;               /*          24 */
	};                                               /*     0    24 */
	struct sock *              sk;                   /*    24     8 */
	union {
		struct net_device * dev;                 /*           8 */
		long unsigned int  dev_scratch;          /*           8 */
	};                                               /*    32     8 */
	char                       cb[48];               /*    40    48 */
	/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */
	long unsigned int          _skb_refdst;          /*    88     8 */
	void                       (*destructor)(struct sk_buff *); /*    96     8 */
	struct sec_path *          sp;                   /*   104     8 */
	long unsigned int          _nfct;                /*   112     8 */
	struct nf_bridge_info *    nf_bridge;            /*   120     8 */
	/* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
	unsigned int               len;                  /*   128     4 */
	unsigned int               data_len;             /*   132     4 */

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ