[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c904f967-a536-5398-dc48-8adb4866ef51@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:19:59 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, amine.kherbouche@...nd.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] bridge: learn dst metadata in FDB
On 17/08/17 15:10, David Lamparter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:51:12PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>> On 17/08/17 14:39, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>>> On 17/08/17 14:03, David Lamparter wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:38:06PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> [cut]
>>>>> and hitting the fast path for everyone in a few different places for a
>>>>> feature that the majority will not use does not sound acceptable to
>>>>> me. We've been trying hard to optimize it, trying to avoid additional
>>>>> cache lines, removing tests and keeping special cases to a minimum.
>>>>
>>>> skb->dst is on the same cacheline as skb->len.
>>>> fdb->md_dst is on the same cacheline as fdb->dst.
>>>> Both will be 0 in a lot of cases, so this should be two null checks on
>>>> data that is hot in the cache. Are you sure this is an actual problem?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure - no, I haven't benchmarked it, but I don't see skb->len being on
>>> the same cache line as _skb_refdst assuming 64 byte cache lines.
>>
>> I should've been clearer - that obviously depends on the kernel config, but
>> in order for them to be in the same line you need to disable either one of
>> conntrack, bridge_netfilter or xfrm, these are almost always enabled (at
>> least in all major distributions).
>
> Did I miscount somewhere? This is what I counted:
> offs size
> 00 16 next/prev/other union bits
> 16 8 sk
> 24 8 dev
> 32 32 cb (first 32 bytes)
> ---- boundary @ 64
> 64 16 cb (last 16 bytes)
> 80 8 _skb_refdst
> 88 8 destructor
> 96 8 (0) sp
> 104 8 (0) _nfct
> 112 8 (0) nf_bridge
> 120 4 len
> 124 4 data_len
> ---- boundary @ 128
> 128 2 mac_len
> 130 2 hdr_len
>
>
> -David
>
What kernel ?
pahole -C sk_buff
struct sk_buff {
union {
struct {
struct sk_buff * next; /* 0 8 */
struct sk_buff * prev; /* 8 8 */
union {
ktime_t tstamp; /* 8 */
u64 skb_mstamp; /* 8 */
}; /* 16 8 */
}; /* 24 */
struct rb_node rbnode; /* 24 */
}; /* 0 24 */
struct sock * sk; /* 24 8 */
union {
struct net_device * dev; /* 8 */
long unsigned int dev_scratch; /* 8 */
}; /* 32 8 */
char cb[48]; /* 40 48 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 24 bytes ago --- */
long unsigned int _skb_refdst; /* 88 8 */
void (*destructor)(struct sk_buff *); /* 96 8 */
struct sec_path * sp; /* 104 8 */
long unsigned int _nfct; /* 112 8 */
struct nf_bridge_info * nf_bridge; /* 120 8 */
/* --- cacheline 2 boundary (128 bytes) --- */
unsigned int len; /* 128 4 */
unsigned int data_len; /* 132 4 */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists