netdev - Re: [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: Properly indent within conditional statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALzJLG-g7V0mmFYT2+j=DGWNHiuYk44BbfCW77zsORmEr2xWWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:35:10 +0300
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: Properly indent within conditional statements

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 PM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed
>> Sent: 17 August 2017 14:30
>> To: David S. Miller
>> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; Leon Romanovsky; Or Gerlitz; Saeed Mahameed
>> Subject: [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: Properly indent within conditional statements
>>
>> From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
>>
>> To fix these checkpatch complaints:
>>
>> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24)
>> +       if (eth_proto & (MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_10GBASE_SR)
>> [...]
>> +                       return PORT_FIBRE;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>>  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c   | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> index a75ac4d11c5b..ed161312a773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> @@ -988,23 +988,23 @@ static u8 get_connector_port(u32 eth_proto, u8 connector_type)
>>               return ptys2connector_type[connector_type];
>>
>>       if (eth_proto & (MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_10GBASE_SR)
>> -                      | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_40GBASE_SR4)
>> -                      | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_100GBASE_SR4)
>> -                      | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_1000BASE_CX_SGMII))) {
>> -                     return PORT_FIBRE;
>> +         | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_40GBASE_SR4)
>> +         | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_100GBASE_SR4)
>> +         | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_1000BASE_CX_SGMII))) {
>> +             return PORT_FIBRE;
>
> Gah, that is why the rules are stupid.
> If anything the continuation lines want indenting a few more bytes.
>

Totally agree,
But if Or wants to follow the rules, I won't stand in his way :).

>         David
>