[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1082320a-d273-8316-9dc6-2dcd06749f5c@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:10:39 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] bpf: don't enable preemption twice in
smap_do_verdict
On 8/17/17 9:03 AM, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 08/17/2017 08:22 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> In smap_do_verdict(), the fall-through branch leads to call
>> preempt_enable() twice for the SK_REDIRECT, which creates an
>> imbalance. Only enable it for all remaining cases again.
>>
>> Fixes: 174a79ff9515 ("bpf: sockmap with sk redirect support")
>> Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/sockmap.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
>> index f7e5e6c..39de541 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
>> @@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ static void smap_do_verdict(struct smap_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> /* Fall through and free skb otherwise */
>> case SK_DROP:
>> default:
>> - preempt_enable();
>> + if (rc != SK_REDIRECT)
>> + preempt_enable();
>> kfree_skb(skb);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> Yep looks good, nice catch Alexei. Thanks! I'll add a selftests entry
> in test_maps to catch this fall through case. Looks like we don't hit
> this case during selftests at the moment.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists