[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6DD005A7C8@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:21:34 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Phil Sutter' <phil@....cc>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [iproute PATCH v2 2/3] iproute_lwtunnel: Argument to strerror
must be positive
From: Phil Sutter
> Sent: 17 August 2017 18:10
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> ---
> ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
> index 398ab5e077ed8..1a3dc4d4c0ed9 100644
> --- a/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
> +++ b/ip/iproute_lwtunnel.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static int lwt_parse_bpf(struct rtattr *rta, size_t len,
> err = bpf_parse_common(bpf_type, &cfg, &bpf_cb_ops, &x);
> if (err < 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to parse eBPF program: %s\n",
> - strerror(err));
> + strerror(-err));
If we are in userspace I'd expect errno values to be +ve.
Returning a -ve errno is very non-standard.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists