netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-net: revert vhost_exceeds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <047bb207-cec6-ece5-470f-340d7c5ee7b7@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2017 20:40:39 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Koichiro Den <den@...ipeden.com>, mst@...hat.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vhost-net: revert vhost_exceeds_maxpend logic to its
 original



On 2017年08月21日 11:06, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年08月19日 14:41, Koichiro Den wrote:
>> To depend on vq.num and the usage of VHOST_MAX_PEND is not succinct
>> and in some case unexpected, so revert its logic part only.
>
> Hi:
>
> Could you explain a little bit more on the case that is was not 
> sufficent?
>
> Thanks

Just have another thought.

I wonder whether or not just use ulimit(memlock) is better here. It 
looks more flexible.

Thanks