netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-binding: net: sfp binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170821140530.GD1703@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:05:30 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dt-binding: net: sfp binding documentation

> The implementation that I've designed is based around the boards that
> I have access to and the various public SFP documentation.  I think
> documenting the bindings suggests that they are stable - I don't think
> we're really ready to make that assertion yet - there may be things
> that have been missed which will only come up when other people start
> using this code.

Hi Russell

That was the point of merging the code. It gets it into people hands
so they can start using it. I want to add support for DSA to make use
of phylink, since i have a couple of boards with SFF connected to
switch ports. I know Cumulus have interest in the code, for their
switches and so do Westermo. 

       Andrew