[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170821155525.GW773745@eidolon>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:55:25 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
To: Amine Kherbouche <amine.kherbouche@...nd.com>
Cc: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mpls: add VPLS entry points
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Amine Kherbouche wrote:
> On 08/16/2017 07:01 PM, David Lamparter wrote:
> > This wires up the neccessary calls for VPLS into the MPLS forwarding
> > pieces. Since CONFIG_MPLS_VPLS doesn't exist yet in Kconfig, it'll
> > never be enabled, so we're on the stubs for now.
[...]
> > + if (rt->rt_payload_type == MPT_VPLS)
> > + return vpls_rcv(skb, dev, pt, rt, hdr, orig_dev);
>
> you should get the ret value of vpls_rcv() and increment stats if error
> occurs.
An error in vpls_rcv() is not a receive error on the outer device's MPLS
layer; the packet was received correctly (and counted for that at the
beginning of mpls_forward()) and dispatched onto an appropriately
configured VPLS device. vpls_rcv() counts its own stats on the inner
device.
[...]
> > +static inline int vpls_rcv(skb, in_dev, pt, rt, hdr, orig_dev)
> > +{
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + return NET_RX_DROP;
>
> just return NET_RX_DROP;
This is not correct; the skb ownership is passed down to vpls_rcv(),
which itself will pass it on via netif_rx(). This is also why the call
in mpls_forward() does *not* "goto drop", instead directly returning.
vpls_rcv() consumes the skb in all cases. Doing this the other way
around would incur extra overhead through a skb_clone() in vpls_rcv()
before giving it to netif_rx().
Note that the vpls_rcv() dummy function in this patch can't be called
because the kernel will refuse to install a VPLS route into the label
table (the is_vpls_device() check will be 0). The dummy is just to keep
the code tidy.
[...]
> > +#endif
> s/ #endif/#endif /* CONFIG_MPLS_VPLS *//
Fixed in next ver (along with the bugged prototype reported by the
build bot.)
Cheers,
-David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists