[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170821144136.477bf655@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:41:36 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: kvalo@...eaurora.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt7601u: check memory allocation failure
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:34:30 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:59:56 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Check memory allocation failure and return -ENOMEM in such a case, as
> > already done a few lines below
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>
> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Wait, I take that back. This code is a bit weird. We would return an
error, then mt7601u_dma_init() will call mt7601u_free_tx_queue() which
doesn't check for tx_q == NULL condition.
Looks like mt7601u_free_tx() has to check for dev->tx_q == NULL and
return early if that's the case. Or mt7601u_alloc_tx() should really
clean things up on it's own on failure. Ugh.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists