[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e7f8dec-2d7f-6e1a-a462-226dcd023724@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:40:32 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-sun8i: choose internal PHY via
phy-is-integrated
On 08/18/2017 05:21 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The current way to find if the phy is internal is to compare DT phy-mode
> and emac_variant/internal_phy.
> But it will negate a possible future SoC where an external PHY use the
> same phy mode than the internal one.
>
> This patch adds a new way to find if the PHY is internal, via
> the phy-is-integrated property.
>
> Since the internal_phy variable does not need anymore to contain the xMII mode
> used by the internal PHY, it is still used for knowing the presence of an
> internal PHY, so it is modified to a boolean soc_has_internal_phy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists