[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170822213229-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:39:24 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jasowang@...hat.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, den@...ipeden.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio-net: invoke zerocopy callback on xmit
path if no tx napi
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:28:28AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 11:01 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:55:56 +0300
> >
> > > Which reminds me that skb_linearize in net core seems to be
> > > fundamentally racy - I suspect that if skb is cloned, and someone is
> > > trying to use the shared frags while another thread calls skb_linearize,
> > > we get some use after free bugs which likely mostly go undetected
> > > because the corrupted packets mostly go on wire and get dropped
> > > by checksum code.
> >
> > Indeed, it does assume that the skb from which the clone was made
> > never has it's geometry changed.
> >
> > I don't think even the TCP retransmit queue has this guarantee.
>
> TCP retransmit makes sure to avoid that.
>
> if (skb_unclone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> ( Before cloning again skb )
>
>
I'm pretty sure not all users of skb_clone or generally
__pskb_pull_tail are careful like this.
E.g. skb_cow_data actually intentionally pulls pages when
skb is cloned.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists