lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:46:50 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: [patch net 2/2] net: sched: don't do tcf_chain_flush from tcf_chain_destroy

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

tcf_chain_flush needs to be called with RTNL. However, on
free_tcf->
 tcf_action_goto_chain_fini->
  tcf_chain_put->
   tcf_chain_destroy->
    tcf_chain_flush
callpath, it is called without RTNL.
This issue was notified by following warning:

[  155.599052] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[  155.603165] 4.13.0-rc5jiri+ #54 Not tainted
[  155.607456] -----------------------------
[  155.611561] net/sched/cls_api.c:195 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!

Since on this callpath, the chain is guaranteed to be already empty
by check in tcf_chain_put, move the tcf_chain_flush call out and call it
only where it is needed - into tcf_block_put.

Fixes: db50514f9a9c ("net: sched: add termination action to allow goto chain")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 45cd34e..6c5ea84 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ static void tcf_chain_destroy(struct tcf_chain *chain)
 	if (!list_empty(&chain->list))
 		list_del_init(&chain->list);
 
-	tcf_chain_flush(chain);
-
 	/* There might still be a reference held when we got here from
 	 * tcf_block_put. Wait for the user to drop reference before free.
 	 */
@@ -296,8 +294,10 @@ void tcf_block_put(struct tcf_block *block)
 	if (!block)
 		return;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, tmp, &block->chain_list, list)
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, tmp, &block->chain_list, list) {
+		tcf_chain_flush(chain);
 		tcf_chain_destroy(chain);
+	}
 	kfree(block);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcf_block_put);
-- 
2.9.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ