[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLinJ0N7b8Xhq4ZoHdB80uXp_MU_vVyzZa7Dq11XrXsvDbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 23:59:05 -0700
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: "Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>,
"pstaszewski@...are.pl" <pstaszewski@...are.pl>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>,
"andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"borkmann@...earbox.net" <borkmann@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: XDP redirect measurements, gotchas and tracepoints
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com> wrote:
>>
>> Right, but it's conceivable to add an API to "return" the buffer to
>> the input device, right?
>
> You could, it is just added complexity. "just free the buffer" in
> ixgbe usually just amounts to one atomic operation to decrement the
> total page count since page recycling is already implemented in the
> driver. You still would have to unmap the buffer regardless of if you
> were recycling it or not so all you would save is 1.000015259 atomic
> operations per packet. The fraction is because once every 64K uses we
> have to bulk update the count on the page.
>
If the buffer is returned to the input device, the input device can
keep the DMA mapping. All it needs to do is to dma_sync it back to
the input device when the buffer is returned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists