[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170824105923.GF23960@kwain>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:59:23 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
Stefan Chulski <stefanc@...vell.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
"gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com"
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com"
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 10/18] net: mvpp2: use the GoP
interrupt for link status changes
Hi Marcin,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:05:33PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> 2017-08-23 18:04 GMT+02:00 Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>:
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 03:24:55PM +0000, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> >> > When the cable is connected (there is signal) and the serdes is in sync and AN
> >> > succeeded.
> >> >
> >> > > With SFF/SFP ports, you generally need a gpio line the fibre module
> >> > > can use to indicate if it has link. Fixed-phy has such support, and
> >> > > your link_change function will get called when the link changes.
> >> >
> >> > So that would work when using SFP modules but I wonder if the GoP irq isn't
> >> > needed when using passive cable, in which case this patch would still be needed
> >> > (and of course we should support the new Russell phylib capabilities).
> >>
> >> Even if new phylib driver supports passive direct cables connection,
> >> GoP IRQ required for SOHO/Peridot external switch support.
> >> SOHO/Peridot external switch could be connected directly to Serdes line.
> >
> > So I guess the GoP link irq patches are needed. Should I resend them
> > then?
> >
> > We'll have to discuss how to handle fixed-phy vs GoP IRQ, but I guess we
> > can do this when adding the fixed-phy support later.
> >
>
> Please check mvneta.c - you can find there coexistence of normal
> libphy support, fixed phy and link irq for the inband management mode.
> IMO it's exactly, what you need here.
From what I see it should be pretty easy to support phy, fixed-phy and
the GoP irq without breaking anything: if no phy is found in the dt,
call of_phy_register_fixed_link() and if the fixed-phy property isn't
found either use the GoP link IRQ. This way all the possibilities would
be supported.
So we should be able to support fixed-phy in a future series.
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists