[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26CD0A38-4AC2-4D37-90A2-D4AEDEBC91FA@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 23:45:22 +0000
From: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "ncardwell@...gle.com" <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
"cgallek@...gle.com" <cgallek@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: fix bpf_setsockopts return value
On 8/24/17, 4:37 PM, "Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
On 08/25/2017 12:48 AM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug causing any sock operations to always return EINVAL.
>
> Fixes: a5192c52377e ("bpf: fix to bpf_setsockops").
> Reported-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
Ohh well, thanks for the fix!
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Thanks! I never checked return values in by bpf test programs
Acked-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists