netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: mvpp2: fix the mac address retrieval logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:58:48 +0200
From:   Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com,
        thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mw@...ihalf.com, stefanc@...vell.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: mvpp2: fix the mac address retrieval
 logic

Hi Dave,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 09:46:24PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:46:54 +0200
> 
> > The MAC address retrieval logic was broken and when using the PPv2
> > driver on PPv2.2 engines I ended up using the same mac address on all
> > ports. This series of patches fixes this, and also tackle a possible bug
> > when defining the mac address in the device tree.
> > 
> > To fix this in a nice way I ended up using a dedicated function to
> > handle the mac retrieval logic. This can be hard to backport into stable
> > kernels. This is why I also made a quick fix which is easy to backport
> > (patch 1/14), to tackle down the PPv2.2 mac retrieval bug. Let me know
> > if this approach is the proper way to handle this or if I should do
> > something else.
> 
> This patch series doesn't apply to any of my trees, that is the first
> thing.

That is very strange, my patches were based on top of net-next. I'll
double check if they apply correctly before sending the v2.

> Secondly, this is a bug fix, and the bug exists in the 'net' tree.
> Therefore this patch series should target the 'net' tree.

OK, that's the question I was asking. I'll resent everything to net
then.

> Please always target legitimate bug fixes at the 'net' tree, rather
> than 'net-next'.

Sure, will do.

Thanks!
Antoine

-- 
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)