[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1503635699.2499.100.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 21:34:59 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andrew@...n.ch,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: mv643xx_eth: Be drop monitor friendly
On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 20:55 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> txq_reclaim() does the normal transmit queue reclamation and
> rxq_deinit() does the RX ring cleanup, none of these are packet drops,
> so use dev_consume_skb() for both locations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> index fb2d533ae4ef..81c1fac00d33 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mv643xx_eth.c
> @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int txq_reclaim(struct tx_queue *txq, int budget, int force)
> struct sk_buff *skb = __skb_dequeue(&txq->tx_skb);
>
> if (!WARN_ON(!skb))
> - dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> + dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
> }
>
> if (cmd_sts & ERROR_SUMMARY) {
> @@ -2024,7 +2024,7 @@ static void rxq_deinit(struct rx_queue *rxq)
>
> for (i = 0; i < rxq->rx_ring_size; i++) {
> if (rxq->rx_skb[i]) {
> - dev_kfree_skb(rxq->rx_skb[i]);
> + dev_consume_skb_any(rxq->rx_skb[i]);
> rxq->rx_desc_count--;
> }
> }
I do not believe this patch is needed.
dev_kfree_skb() is an alias of consume_skb(), which is already drop
monitor ready ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists