[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170825094116.GE2023@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:41:16 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 3/4] net_sched: remove tc class reference
counting
Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 01:51:29AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>For TC classes, their ->get() and ->put() are always paired, and the
>reference counting is completely useless, because:
>
>1) For class modification and dumping paths, we already hold RTNL lock,
> so all of these ->get(),->change(),->put() are atomic.
>
>2) For filter bindiing/unbinding, we use other reference counter than
> this one, and they should have RTNL lock too.
>
>3) For ->qlen_notify(), it is special because it is called on ->enqueue()
> path, but we already hold qdisc tree lock there, and we hold this
> tree lock when graft or delete the class too, so it should not be gone
> or changed until we release the tree lock.
>
>Therefore, this patch removes ->get() and ->put(), but:
>
>1) Adds a new ->find() to find the pointer to a class by classid, no
> refcnt.
>
>2) Move the original class destroy upon the last refcnt into ->delete(),
> right after releasing tree lock. This is fine because the class is
> already removed from hash when holding the lock.
>
>For those who also use ->put() as ->unbind(), just rename them to reflect
>this change.
>
>Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Look very nice. Thanks!
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists