netdev - Re: Permissions for eBPF objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 18:03:32 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        SELinux <Selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>, mic@...ikod.net
Subject: Re: Permissions for eBPF objects

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:07:27PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/25/2017 09:52 PM, Chenbo Feng wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 11:01 -0700, Jeffrey Vander Stoep via Selinux
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I’d like to get your thoughts on adding LSM permission checks on BPF
> > > > > objects.

before reinventing the wheel please take a look at landlock work.
Everything that was discussed in this thread is covered by it.
The patches have been in development for more than a year and most of the early
issues have been resolved.
It will be presented again during security summit in LA in September.