[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <291b863f-552e-2f3b-f658-e812d0848949@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 11:30:58 +0300
From: "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com; alexander.h.duyck@...el.com; raanan.avargil@...el.com; dima.ruinskiy"@intel.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] e1000e: apply burst mode settings only
on default
On 8/25/2017 18:06, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
>
> Devices that support FLAG2_DMA_BURST have different default values
> for RDTR and RADV. Apply burst mode default settings only when no
> explicit value was passed at module load.
>
> The RDTR default is zero. If the module is loaded for low latency
> operation with RxIntDelay=0, do not override this value with a burst
> default of 32.
>
> Move the decision to apply burst values earlier, where explicitly
> initialized module variables can be distinguished from defaults.
>
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 4 ----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 8 --------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> index 98e68888abb1..2311b31bdcac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> @@ -94,10 +94,6 @@ struct e1000_info;
> */
> #define E1000_CHECK_RESET_COUNT 25
>
> -#define DEFAULT_RDTR 0
> -#define DEFAULT_RADV 8
> -#define BURST_RDTR 0x20
> -#define BURST_RADV 0x20
> #define PCICFG_DESC_RING_STATUS 0xe4
> #define FLUSH_DESC_REQUIRED 0x100
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 327dfe5bedc0..47b89aac7969 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -3223,14 +3223,6 @@ static void e1000_configure_rx(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> */
> ew32(RXDCTL(0), E1000_RXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE);
> ew32(RXDCTL(1), E1000_RXDCTL_DMA_BURST_ENABLE);
> -
> - /* override the delay timers for enabling bursting, only if
> - * the value was not set by the user via module options
> - */
> - if (adapter->rx_int_delay == DEFAULT_RDTR)
> - adapter->rx_int_delay = BURST_RDTR;
> - if (adapter->rx_abs_int_delay == DEFAULT_RADV)
> - adapter->rx_abs_int_delay = BURST_RADV;
> }
>
> /* set the Receive Delay Timer Register */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
> index 6d8c39abee16..bb696c98f9b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/param.c
> @@ -73,17 +73,25 @@ E1000_PARAM(TxAbsIntDelay, "Transmit Absolute Interrupt Delay");
> /* Receive Interrupt Delay in units of 1.024 microseconds
> * hardware will likely hang if you set this to anything but zero.
> *
> + * Burst variant is used as default if device has FLAG2_DMA_BURST.
> + *
> * Valid Range: 0-65535
> */
> E1000_PARAM(RxIntDelay, "Receive Interrupt Delay");
> +#define DEFAULT_RDTR 0
> +#define BURST_RDTR 0x20
> #define MAX_RXDELAY 0xFFFF
> #define MIN_RXDELAY 0
>
> /* Receive Absolute Interrupt Delay in units of 1.024 microseconds
> + *
> + * Burst variant is used as default if device has FLAG2_DMA_BURST.
> *
> * Valid Range: 0-65535
> */
> E1000_PARAM(RxAbsIntDelay, "Receive Absolute Interrupt Delay");
> +#define DEFAULT_RADV 8
> +#define BURST_RADV 0x20
> #define MAX_RXABSDELAY 0xFFFF
> #define MIN_RXABSDELAY 0
>
> @@ -297,6 +305,9 @@ void e1000e_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> .max = MAX_RXDELAY } }
> };
>
> + if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DMA_BURST)
> + opt.def = BURST_RDTR;
> +
> if (num_RxIntDelay > bd) {
> adapter->rx_int_delay = RxIntDelay[bd];
> e1000_validate_option(&adapter->rx_int_delay, &opt,
> @@ -307,7 +318,7 @@ void e1000e_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> }
> /* Receive Absolute Interrupt Delay */
> {
> - static const struct e1000_option opt = {
> + static struct e1000_option opt = {
> .type = range_option,
> .name = "Receive Absolute Interrupt Delay",
> .err = "using default of "
> @@ -317,6 +328,9 @@ void e1000e_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> .max = MAX_RXABSDELAY } }
> };
>
> + if (adapter->flags2 & FLAG2_DMA_BURST)
> + opt.def = BURST_RADV;
> +
> if (num_RxAbsIntDelay > bd) {
> adapter->rx_abs_int_delay = RxAbsIntDelay[bd];
> e1000_validate_option(&adapter->rx_abs_int_delay, &opt,
This patch looks good for me, but I would like hear second opinion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists