lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170828155217.GA8399@bistromath.localdomain>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:52:17 +0200
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
        Mohamad Haj Yahia <mohamad@...lanox.com>,
        Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: Add SRIOV VGT+ support

2017-08-27, 14:06:15 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
[...]
> +#define VF_VLAN_BITMAP	DIV_ROUND_UP(VF_VLAN_N_VID, sizeof(__u64) * BITS_PER_BYTE)
> +struct ifla_vf_vlan_trunk {
> +	__u32 vf;
> +	__u64 allowed_vlans_8021q_bm[VF_VLAN_BITMAP];
> +	__u64 allowed_vlans_8021ad_bm[VF_VLAN_BITMAP];
> +};

This is huge (1032B). And you put one of these in the netlink message
for each VF.  This means that with 51 VF (at least in my environment,
where each VF takes 1296B), you're going to overflow the u16 size of a
single attribute (IFLA_VFINFO_LIST), and you cannot dump the device
anymore. I'm afraid this is going to break existing setups.

-- 
Sabrina

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ