netdev - Re: Get ARP/ND tables from kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E0D909EE5BB15A4699798539EA149D7F07796D3C@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Aug 2017 02:53:19 +0000
From:   "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter" <peter.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:     Bassam Alsanie <bassam.alsanie@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Get ARP/ND tables from kernel

On 8/27/17 9:25 PM, Bassam Alsanie wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I looking into a good way (stable and compatible with large number of
> distros) to get the arp/nd cache from kernel to user space, for both
> IP4 and IP6.
> 
> It seem IOCTL (SIOCGARP) can't do that, you can only get MAC address
> from provided IP address. But IOCTL can't give the the full arp/nd
> table.
> The other option is the Netlink interface. I tried it and I got the
> ARP/ND table :).
> The third option is using /proc/net/arp, which only restricted to IP4.
> 
> There is command line utilities that I excluding in my case.
> 
> Is there another way to do it? what is the best way in my case?
> 
> Thank you all.

# strace arp -an
[...]
open("/proc/net/arp", O_RDONLY)         = 4
fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
read(4, "IP address       HW type     Fla"..., 1024) = 310
[...]

# strace ip -6 neighbor show
[...]
socket(AF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, NETLINK_ROUTE) = 3
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, [32768], 4) = 0
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, [1048576], 4) = 0
bind(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, nl_groups=00000000}, 12) = 0
getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=30292, nl_groups=00000000}, 
[12]) = 0
sendto(3, {{len=40, type=RTM_GETLINK, flags=NLM_F_REQUEST|NLM_F_DUMP, 
seq=1503888680, pid=0}, 
"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\10\0\35\0\1\0\0\0"}, 40, 0, NULL, 0) = 40
recvmsg(3, {msg_name={sa_family=AF_NETLINK, nl_pid=0, 
nl_groups=00000000}, msg_namelen=12, msg_iov=[{iov_base=[{{len=1268, 
type=RTM_NEWLINK, flags=NLM_F_MULTI, seq=1503888680, pid=30292}, 
"\0\0\4\3\1\0\0\0I\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\7\0\3\0lo\0\0\10\0\r\0\350\3\0\0"...}, 
{{len=1280, type=RTM_NEWLINK, flags=NLM_F_MULTI, seq=1503888680, 
pid=30292}, 
"\0\0\1\0\2\0\0\0C\20\1\0\0\0\0\0\t\0\3\0eno1\0\0\0\0\10\0\r\0"...}], 
iov_len=32768}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 2548
[...]

Seems like it's pretty obvious if you don't want to use the existing 
tools, just look at how the existing tools get this data.  IPv4 uses 
/proc/net/arp, IPv6 uses netlink.

Cheers,
-PJ