netdev - Re: [PATCH] be2net: Fix some u16 fields appropriately

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <979AB2E6-7D90-4C6B-B43F-1D17EE621D05@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Aug 2017 09:04:57 +0800
From:   严海双 <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     sathya.perla@...adcom.com, ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com,
        sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com, somnath.kotur@...adcom.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] be2net: Fix some u16 fields appropriately


> On 2017年8月29日, at 上午7:19, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> From: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2017 15:24:45 +0800
> 
>> In be_tx_compl_process, frag_index declared as u32, so it's better to
>> declare last_index as u32 also.
>> 
>> CC: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>
>> Fixes: b0fd2eb28bd4 ("be2net: Declare some u16 fields as u32 to improve
>> performance")
>> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@...s.chinamobile.com>
> 
> That is not a legitimate reason for making this change.
> 
>> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ struct be_tx_stats {
>> /* Structure to hold some data of interest obtained from a TX CQE */
>> struct be_tx_compl_info {
>> 	u8 status;		/* Completion status */
>> -	u16 end_index;		/* Completed TXQ Index */
>> +	u32 end_index;		/* Completed TXQ Index */
>> };
>> 
>> struct be_tx_obj {
> 
> The ->end_index comes solely from:
> 
> 	txcp->end_index = GET_TX_COMPL_BITS(wrb_index, compl);
> 
> Which is precisely a 16-bit value.
> 
> I'm not applying this, sorry.
> 

Hi David,

The GET_TX_COMPL_BITS comes from amap_get which also returns a 32-bit value:

  6 static inline u32 amap_get(void *ptr, u32 dw_offset, u32 mask, u32 offset)
  5 {
  4     u32 *dw = (u32 *) ptr;
  3     return mask & (*(dw + dw_offset) >> offset);
  2 }
  1
869 #define AMAP_GET_BITS(_struct, field, ptr)              \
  1         amap_get(ptr,                       \
  2             offsetof(_struct, field)/32,            \
  3             amap_mask(sizeof(((_struct *)0)->field)),   \
  4             AMAP_BIT_OFFSET(_struct, field))