[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170830111118.wy62va6sjzsxrgoo@tarshish>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:11:18 +0300
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-binding: net: sfp binding documentation
Hi Sergei,
Thanks for reviewing.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 02:04:11PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 8/30/2017 12:51 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>
> > Add device-tree binding documentation SFP transceivers. Support for SFP
> > transceivers has been recently introduced (drivers/net/phy/sfp.c).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > Rename -gpio properties to -gpios
> > Rename the rate-select-gpio property to rate-select0-gpios
> > Add the rate-select1-gpios property
> > Add examples
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..1d9c786d6287
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +Small Form Factor (SFF) Committee Small Form-factor Pluggable (SFP)
> > +Transceiver
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > +- compatible : must be "sff,sfp"
> > +
> > +Optional Properties:
> > +
> > +- i2c-bus : phandle of an I2C bus controller for the SFP two wire serial
> > + interface
> > +
> > +- moddef0-gpios : phandle of the MOD-DEF0 (AKA Mod_ABS) module presence input
> > + gpio signal
>
> Your example shows there's GPIO phandle *and* specifier.
Would "GPIO specifier" be enough here?
[...]
> > +Example #2: Serdes to PHY to SFP connection
> > +
> > +sfp_eth0: sfp-eth0 {
> > + compatible = "sff,sfp+";
> > + i2c-bus = <&sfpp0_i2c>;
> > + los-gpio = <&cps_gpio1 28 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> You describe "los-gpios" above , not "los-gpio" (which is a deprecated form).
Will fix.
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@...s.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists