[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504110571.11498.120.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:29:31 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Subject: [PATCH net] kcm: do not attach PF_KCM sockets to avoid deadlock
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
syzkaller had no problem to trigger a deadlock, attaching a KCM socket
to another one (or itself). (original syzkaller report was a very
confusing lockdep splat during a sendmsg())
It seems KCM claims to only support TCP, but no enforcement is done,
so we might need to add additional checks.
Fixes: ab7ac4eb9832 ("kcm: Kernel Connection Multiplexor module")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
---
net/kcm/kcmsock.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
index 48e993b2dbcf1afae04968ed840e2e98c2cf6772..af4e76ac88ff0817398d1d7460a41f0cd5fe6f30 100644
--- a/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
+++ b/net/kcm/kcmsock.c
@@ -1387,6 +1387,10 @@ static int kcm_attach(struct socket *sock, struct socket *csock,
if (!csk)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* We must prevent loops or risk deadlock ! */
+ if (csk->sk_family == PF_KCM)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
psock = kmem_cache_zalloc(kcm_psockp, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!psock)
return -ENOMEM;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists