netdev - Re: [PATCH net 6/9] sch_fq_codel: avoid double free on init failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152fa91b-f2a6-1fa1-f6d6-3a5a8f5db590@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:   Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:37:21 +0300
From:   Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 6/9] sch_fq_codel: avoid double free on init failure

On 30/08/17 20:36, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
> <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> It is very unlikely to happen but the backlogs memory allocation
>> could fail and will free q->flows, but then ->destroy() will free
>> q->flows too. For correctness remove the first free and let ->destroy
>> clean up.
>>
>> Fixes: 87b60cfacf9f ("net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation")
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>>  net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c b/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
>> index 337f2d6d81e4..2c0c05f2cc34 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
>> @@ -491,10 +491,8 @@ static int fq_codel_init(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
>>                 if (!q->flows)
>>                         return -ENOMEM;
>>                 q->backlogs = kvzalloc(q->flows_cnt * sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -               if (!q->backlogs) {
>> -                       kvfree(q->flows);
>> +               if (!q->backlogs)
>>                         return -ENOMEM;
>> -               }
> 
> This is fine. Or we can NULL it after kvfree().
> 
> I have no preference here. The only difference here is if we still
> expect ->init() to cleanup its own failure.
> 

We don't, that's the point of the changes that lead to these fixes,
the way ->destroy() is used by both the default qdisc infra and the
normal qdisc add suggest that it should clean up after ->init failure,
thus the change.