[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpU9B71C5cWs969k464T7HvNhcwps7NYNQx8Q3KCijOfnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:01:06 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net_sched: add reverse binding for tc class
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 08/30/2017 11:30 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Note, we still can NOT totally get rid of those class lookup in
>> ->enqueue() because cgroup and flow filters have no way to determine
>> the classid at setup time, they still have to go through dynamic lookup.
>
> [...]
>>
>> ---
>> include/net/sch_generic.h | 1 +
>> net/sched/cls_basic.c | 9 +++++++
>> net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 9 +++++++
>
>
> Same is for cls_bpf as well, so bind_class wouldn't work there
> either as we could return dynamic classids. bind_class cannot
> be added here, too.
I think you are probably right, but the following code is
misleading there:
if (tb[TCA_BPF_CLASSID]) {
prog->res.classid = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_BPF_CLASSID]);
tcf_bind_filter(tp, &prog->res, base);
}
If the classid is dynamic, why this tb[TCA_BPF_CLASSID]?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists