[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1504251046-17106-3-git-send-email-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:30:46 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] xfrm: Fix return value check of copy_sec_ctx.
A recent commit added an output_mark. When copying
this output_mark, the return value of copy_sec_ctx
is overwitten without a check. Fix this by copying
the output_mark before the security context.
Fixes: 077fbac405bf ("net: xfrm: support setting an output mark.")
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index cc3268d..490132d 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -900,13 +900,13 @@ static int copy_to_user_state_extra(struct xfrm_state *x,
ret = copy_user_offload(&x->xso, skb);
if (ret)
goto out;
- if (x->security)
- ret = copy_sec_ctx(x->security, skb);
if (x->props.output_mark) {
ret = nla_put_u32(skb, XFRMA_OUTPUT_MARK, x->props.output_mark);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
+ if (x->security)
+ ret = copy_sec_ctx(x->security, skb);
out:
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists