[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1504654510-31004-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 01:35:02 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: [PATCH v2 rfc 0/8] IGMP snooping for local traffic
After the very useful feedback from Nikolay, i threw away what i had,
and started again. To recap:
The linux bridge supports IGMP snooping. It will listen to IGMP
reports on bridge ports and keep track of which groups have been
joined on an interface. It will then forward multicast based on this
group membership.
When the bridge adds or removed groups from an interface, it uses
switchdev to request the hardware add an mdb to a port, so the
hardware can perform the selective forwarding between ports.
What is not covered by the current bridge code, is IGMP joins/leaves
from the host on the brX interface. These are not reported via
switchdev so that hardware knows the local host is interested in the
multicast frames.
Luckily, the bridge does track joins/leaves on the brX interface. The
code is obfusticated, which is why i missed it with my first attempt.
So the first patch tries to remove this obfustication. Currently,
there is no notifications sent when the bridge interface joins a
group. The second patch adds them. bridge monitor then shows
joins/leaves in the same way as for other ports of the bridge.
Then starts the work passing down to the hardware that the host has
joined/left a group. The existing switchdev mdb object cannot be used,
since the semantics are different. The existing
SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB is used to indicate a specific multicast
group should be forwarded out that port of the switch. However here we
require the exact opposite. We want multicast frames for the group
received on the port to the forwarded to the host. Hence add a new
object SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB, a multicast database entry to
forward to the host. This new object is then propagated through the
DSA layers. No DSA driver changes should be needed, this should just
work...
Getting the frames to the bridge as requested turned up an issue or
three. The offload_fwd_mark is not being set by DSA, so the bridge
floods the received frames back to the switch ports, resulting in
duplication since the hardware has already flooded the packet. Fixing
that turned up an issue with the meaning of
SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID in DSA. A DSA fabric of three
switches needs to look to the software bridge as a single
switch. Otherwise the offload_fwd_mark does not work, and we get
duplication on the non-ingress switch. But each switch returned a
different value. And they were not unique.
The third and last issue will be explained in a followup email.
Open questions:
Is sending notifications going to break userspace?
Is this new switchdev object O.K. for the few non-DSA switches that exist?
Is the SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID change acceptable?
Andrew
Andrew Lunn (8):
net: bridge: Rename mglist to host_joined
net: bridge: Send notification when host join/leaves a group
net: bridge: Add/del switchdev object on host join/leave
net: dsa: slave: Handle switchdev host mdb add/del
net: dsa: switch: handle host mdb add/remove
net: dsa: switch: Don't add CPU port to an mdb by default
net: dsa: set offload_fwd_mark on received packets
net: dsa: Fix SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_PARENT_ID
include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 +-
net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
net/bridge/br_multicast.c | 18 +++++++-----
net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 +-
net/dsa/dsa.c | 1 +
net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 7 +++++
net/dsa/port.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++
net/dsa/slave.c | 16 ++++++++---
net/dsa/switch.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 ++
11 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists