lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:58:16 -0700
From:   Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
To:     Håkon Bugge <Haakon.Bugge@...cle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        rds-devel@....oracle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        knut.omang@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rds: Fix incorrect statistics counting

On 9/6/2017 8:29 AM, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> In rds_send_xmit() there is logic to batch the sends. However, if
> another thread has acquired the lock, it is considered a race and we
> yield. The code incrementing the s_send_lock_queue_raced statistics
> counter did not count this event correctly.
> 
> This commit removes a small race in determining the race and
> increments the statistics counter correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
> ---
>   net/rds/send.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
Those counters are not really to give that accurate so
am not very keen to add additional cycles in send paths
and add additional code. Have you seen any real issue
or this is just a observation. s_send_lock_queue_raced
counter is never used to check for smaller increments
and hence the question.

Regards,
Santosh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ