netdev - RE: [PATCH v2 rfc 0/8] IGMP snooping for local traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9235D6609DB808459E95D78E17F2E43D40B19584@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 23:44:47 +0000
From:   <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To:     <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>, <jbe@...gutronix.de>,
        <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 rfc 0/8] IGMP snooping for local traffic

> That being said, I have a feeling that the Marvell switches behave a
> tiny bit differently than others in that they do not flood broadcast by
> default in a given L2 domain.
Florian,

Because some DSA switches from Marvell & Microchip can do IGMP snooping, 
can we propose switch layer another flag what to do when HW support it?

- Woojung