netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 rfc 0/8] IGMP snooping for local traffic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170906004703.GB27385@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:47:03 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, jbe@...gutronix.de,
        sean.wang@...iatek.com, john@...ozen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rfc 0/8] IGMP snooping for local traffic

> The third and last issue will be explained in a followup email.

Hi DSA hackers

So there is the third issue. It affects just DSA, but it possible
affects all DSA drivers.

This patchset broken broadcast with the Marvell drivers. It could
break broadcast on others drivers as well.

What i found is that the Marvell chips don't flood broadcast frames
between bridged ports. What appears to happen is there is a fdb miss,
so it gets forwarded to the CPU port for the host to deal with. The
software bridge when floods it out all ports of the bridge.

But the set offload_fwd_mark patch changes this. The software bridge
now assumes the hardware has already flooded broadcast out all ports
of the switch as needed. So it does not do any flooding itself. As a
result, on Marvell devices, broadcast packets don't get flooded at
all.

The issue can be fixed. I just need to add an mdb entry for the
broadcast address to each port of the bridge in the switch, and the
CPU port.  But i don't know at what level to do this.

Should this be done at the DSA level, or at the driver level?  Do any
chips do broadcast flooding in hardware already? Hence they currently
see broadcast duplication? If i add a broadcast mdb at the DSA level,
and the chip is already hard wired to flooding broadcast, is it going
to double flood?

	Andrew