[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170906151922.4a320b1d@elisabeth>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:19:22 +0200
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hung task in mac80211
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 14:48:35 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> I'll look in a bit - but
>
> > + mutex_unlock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
> > ___ieee80211_stop_rx_ba_session(
> > sta, tid, WLAN_BACK_RECIPIENT,
> > WLAN_REASON_QSTA_TIMEOUT, true);
>
> This already has three underscores so shouldn't drop.
Right, of course.
> [...]
> > + mutex_unlock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
> > __ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(sta, 0, 0,
> > 0, 1, tid,
>
> maybe this one needs a ___ version then?
Either that, or as it's a single call, perhaps just the following?
Matter of taste I guess...
diff --git a/net/mac80211/ht.c b/net/mac80211/ht.c
index c92df492e898..377dd3c233d3 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/ht.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/ht.c
@@ -332,10 +332,13 @@ void ieee80211_ba_session_work(struct work_struct *work)
WLAN_REASON_UNSPECIFIED, true);
if (test_and_clear_bit(tid,
- sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx_manage_offl))
+ sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx_manage_offl)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
__ieee80211_start_rx_ba_session(sta, 0, 0, 0, 1, tid,
IEEE80211_MAX_AMPDU_BUF,
false, true);
+ mutex_lock(&sta->ampdu_mlme.mtx);
+ }
if (test_and_clear_bit(tid + IEEE80211_NUM_TIDS,
sta->ampdu_mlme.tid_rx_manage_offl))
--
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists