[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170906133928.3152020-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:38:58 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] isdn: isdnloop: fix logic error in isdnloop_sendbuf
gcc-7 found an ancient bug in the loop driver, leading to a condition that
is always false, meaning we ignore the contents of 'card->flags' here:
drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c:412:37: error: ?: using integer constants in boolean context, the expression will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
This changes the braces in the expression to ensure we actually
compare the flag bits, rather than comparing a constant. As Joe Perches
pointed out, an earlier patch of mine incorrectly assumed this was a
false-positive warning.
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9840289/
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c b/drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c
index 6ffd13466b8c..e97232646ba1 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ isdnloop_sendbuf(int channel, struct sk_buff *skb, isdnloop_card *card)
return -EINVAL;
}
if (len) {
- if (!(card->flags & (channel) ? ISDNLOOP_FLAGS_B2ACTIVE : ISDNLOOP_FLAGS_B1ACTIVE))
+ if (!(card->flags & (channel ? ISDNLOOP_FLAGS_B2ACTIVE : ISDNLOOP_FLAGS_B1ACTIVE)))
return 0;
if (card->sndcount[channel] > ISDNLOOP_MAX_SQUEUE)
return 0;
--
2.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists