[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJieiUgSGukygXBYRKpE4ROYXnd9UZ=cFr4YvVhrerkOn15iDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 07:19:58 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: sch_clsact: add support for global per-netns
classifier mode
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:04:17AM CEST, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
>>>>> <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>> This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
>>>>>> classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
>>>>>> a particular device will be classified using the global classifier.
>>>>>> We have needed a global classifier for some time now for various
>>>>>> purposes and setting the single bridge or loopback/vrf device as the
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you elaborate a bit more on the ... "we have needed a global
>>> classifier for some time now for various purposes".
>>
>>Most of our acl's are global or use a wildcard. eg iptables supports
>>global rules without an dev. We do end up having hundreds of netdevs.
>>Another use case for the future is use of tc for policy based routing
>>which requires global rules.
>
> That is not how TC works. There are devices, qdiscs, blocks, chains. The
> global approach does not fit. The block sharing gets you what you need,
> without need for any ugly hack.
We know how TC works. And we are only trying to see if the classifiers
and actions can be used
in other use-cases. Note that the patch was an RFC to start the
discussion and refine
it. We will explore your block sharing patches when they are in.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists