netdev - RE: [PATCH net 0/3] lan78xx: Fixes to lan78xx driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9235D6609DB808459E95D78E17F2E43D40B1AE78@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:26:52 +0000
From:   <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To:     <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     <Nisar.Sayed@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 0/3] lan78xx: Fixes to lan78xx driver

> > > > This series of patches are for lan78xx driver.
> > > >
> > > > These patches fixes potential issues associated with lan78xx driver
> > >
> > > Hi Nisar
> > >
> > > So this is version 2? Please include v2 in the subject line.
> > >
> > > Also, briefly list what is different from the previous version.
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > Because Nisar dropped of non-mdio patch in the series,
> > I suggested to treat as new patch than version 2.
> > In this case, it is still considered as version 2 than new series?
> 
> Hi Woojung
> 
> So it is not a clear hard rule here. But we have seen these patches
> before, and they have been modified based on my comments. So i would
> say these are version 2. But a new series would also be O.K. What
> really matters is that the cover note explains what is going on. That
> some of the patches in the previous version have been dropped and will
> be posted later, and what changes have been made to the remaining
> patches.

Andrew,
Thanks for detail explanation and agree that cover page has more description.

Thanks.
Woojung