[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1504892748-1605-4-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 19:45:42 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] netfilter: nf_nat: don't bug when mapping already exists
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
It seems preferrable to limp along if we have a conflicting mapping,
its certainly better than a BUG().
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index 40573aa6c133..dc3519cc7209 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -416,7 +416,9 @@ nf_nat_setup_info(struct nf_conn *ct,
WARN_ON(maniptype != NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC &&
maniptype != NF_NAT_MANIP_DST);
- BUG_ON(nf_nat_initialized(ct, maniptype));
+
+ if (WARN_ON(nf_nat_initialized(ct, maniptype)))
+ return NF_DROP;
/* What we've got will look like inverse of reply. Normally
* this is what is in the conntrack, except for prior
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists