[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60c8906b751d4915be456009c220516e-mfwitten@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 05:06:30 -0000
From: Michael Witten <mfwitten@...il.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] net: skb_queue_purge(): lock/unlock the list only once
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:07:40 +0000
With this commit, the list's lock is locked/unlocked only once
for the duration of `skb_queue_purge()'.
Hitherto, the list's lock has been locked/unlocked every time
an item is dequeued; this seems not only inefficient, but also
incorrect, as the whole point of `skb_queue_purge()' is to clear
the list, presumably without giving anything else a chance to
manipulate the list in the interim.
Signed-off-by: Michael Witten <mfwitten@...il.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 68065d7d383f..66c0731a2a5f 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -2834,9 +2834,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_dequeue_tail);
*/
void skb_queue_purge(struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- while ((skb = skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&list->lock, flags);
+ while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
kfree_skb(skb);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_queue_purge);
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists