[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170913080516.GD25977@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:05:16 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory leaks in conntrack
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> While testing my TC filter patches (so not related to conntrack), the
> following memory leaks are shown up:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff9b19ba551228 (size 128):
> comm "chronyd", pid 338, jiffies 4294910829 (age 53.188s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
> 00 00 00 00 18 00 00 30 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .......0........
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff9f1e1175>] create_object+0x169/0x2aa
> [<ffffffff9fb77fb2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41
> [<ffffffff9f1c47ed>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x44/0x65
> [<ffffffff9f1ca2db>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x113/0x146
> [<ffffffff9f193c3b>] __krealloc+0x4a/0x69
> [<ffffffff9f948dbd>] nf_ct_ext_add+0xe1/0x145
> [<ffffffff9f942395>] init_conntrack+0x1f7/0x36e
> [<ffffffff9f942762>] nf_conntrack_in+0x1d3/0x326
> [<ffffffff9fa1ea69>] ipv4_conntrack_local+0x4d/0x50
> [<ffffffff9f93ad70>] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0x9b
> [<ffffffff9f9c7999>] nf_hook.constprop.40+0xbe/0xd8
> [<ffffffff9f9c7ba2>] __ip_local_out+0xb3/0xbf
> [<ffffffff9f9c7bca>] ip_local_out+0x1c/0x36
> [<ffffffff9f9c9216>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x3d
> [<ffffffff9f9ee3de>] udp_send_skb+0x17e/0x1df
> [<ffffffff9f9eea37>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a2/0x77c
> unreferenced object 0xffff9b19a69b3340 (size 336):
> comm "chronyd", pid 338, jiffies 4294910868 (age 53.032s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 01 00 00 00 5a 5a 5a 5a 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ....ZZZZ.....N..
> ff ff ff ff 5a 5a 5a 5a ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ....ZZZZ........
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff9f1e1175>] create_object+0x169/0x2aa
> [<ffffffff9fb77fb2>] kmemleak_alloc+0x25/0x41
> [<ffffffff9f1c47ed>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0x44/0x65
> [<ffffffff9f1c7a7d>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xd7/0x1f1
> [<ffffffff9f941b78>] __nf_conntrack_alloc+0xa2/0x146
> [<ffffffff9f942250>] init_conntrack+0xb2/0x36e
> [<ffffffff9f942762>] nf_conntrack_in+0x1d3/0x326
> [<ffffffff9fa1ea69>] ipv4_conntrack_local+0x4d/0x50
> [<ffffffff9f93ad70>] nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0x9b
> [<ffffffff9f9c7999>] nf_hook.constprop.40+0xbe/0xd8
> [<ffffffff9f9c7ba2>] __ip_local_out+0xb3/0xbf
> [<ffffffff9f9c7bca>] ip_local_out+0x1c/0x36
> [<ffffffff9f9c9216>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x3d
> [<ffffffff9f9ee3de>] udp_send_skb+0x17e/0x1df
> [<ffffffff9f9eea37>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a2/0x77c
> [<ffffffff9f9f8cb8>] inet_sendmsg+0x37/0x5e
>
> I don't touch chronyd in my VM, so I have no idea why it sends out UDP
> packets, my guess is it is some periodical packet.
>
> I don't think I use conntrack either, since /proc/net/ip_conntrack
> does not exist.
You probably do, can you try "cat /proc/net/nf_conntrack" instead?
(otherwise there should be no ipv4_conntrack_local() invocation
since we would not register this hook at all).
I tried to reproduce this but so far I had no success.
If you can identify something that could give a hint when this
is happening (only once after boot, periodically, only with udp, etc)
please let us know.
(A reproducer would be even better of course ;-) )
Is this with current net tree?
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists