netdev - Re: 319554f284dd ("inet: don't use sk_v6_rcv_saddr directly") causes bind port regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <588f3795-931e-7779-4ec7-5fe7d4437927@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2017 08:44:48 -0700
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:     Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cole Robinson <crobinso@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 319554f284dd ("inet: don't use sk_v6_rcv_saddr directly") causes
 bind port regression

On 09/12/2017 04:12 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> First I’m super sorry for the top post, I’m at plumbers and I forgot to upload my muttrc to my new cloud instance, so I’m screwed using outlook.
> 
> I have a completely untested, uncompiled patch that I think will fix the problem, would you mind giving it a go?  Thanks,
> 
> Josef

Thanks for the quick turnaround. Unfortunately, the problem is still
reproducible according to the reporter.

Thanks,
Laura