[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170919194102.h2nu72evbqhpu765@f1.synalogic.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:41:02 +0200
From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.com>
To: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@...fish-solutions.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
Subject: Re: [5/5] e1000e: Avoid receiver overrun interrupt bursts
On 2017/09/19 12:38, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We’ve been running this patchset (all 5) for about as long as they’ve been under review… about 2 months. And in a burn-in lab with heavy traffic.
>
> We’ve not seen a single link-flap in hundreds of ours of saturated traffic.
>
> Would love to see some resolution soon on this as we don’t want to ship a release with unsanctioned patches.
>
> Is there an estimate on when that might be?
The patches have been added to Jeff Kirsher's next-queue tree. I guess
they will be submitted for v4.15 which might be released in early
2018...
http://phb-crystal-ball.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists