netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Implement delete for BPF LPM trie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEfhGiybHecYsJ+3eXMFfohh_Jp_yyDfr8ZkydGaQyZJbVQXwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:16:13 -0400
From:   Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Implement delete for BPF LPM trie

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org> wrote:
> On 09/19/2017 10:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:30:54 -0400
>>
>>> This was previously left as a TODO.  Add the implementation and
>>> extend the test to cover it.
>>
>> Series applied, thanks.
>>
>
> Hmm, I think these patches need some more discussion regarding the IM
> nodes handling, see the reply I sent an hour ago. Could you wait for
> that before pushing your tree?

I can follow up with a patch to implement your suggestion.  It's
really just an efficiency improvement, though, so I think it's ok to
handle independently. (Sorry, I haven't had a chance to play with the
implementation details yet).

Craig