[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170919.160134.534837308168786965.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: peterpenkov96@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,net-next,0/2] Improve code coverage of syzkaller
From: Petar Penkov <peterpenkov96@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:34:00 -0700
> The following patches address this by providing the user(syzkaller)
> with the ability to send via napi_gro_receive() and napi_gro_frags().
> Additionally, syzkaller can specify how many fragments there are and
> how much data per fragment there is. This is done by exploiting the
> convenient structure of iovecs. Finally, this patch series adds
> support for exercising the flow dissector during fuzzing.
>
> The code path including napi_gro_receive() can be enabled via the
> CONFIG_TUN_NAPI compile-time flag, and can be used by users other than
> syzkaller. The remainder of the changes in this patch series give the
> user significantly more control over packets entering the kernel. To
> avoid potential security vulnerabilities, hide the ability to send
> custom skbs and the flow dissector code paths behind a run-time flag
> IFF_NAPI_FRAGS that is advertised and accepted only if CONFIG_TUN_NAPI
> is enabled.
>
> The patch series will be followed with changes to packetdrill, where
> these additions to the TUN driver are exercised and demonstrated.
> This will give the ability to write regression tests for specific
> parts of the early networking stack.
>
> Patch 1/ Add NAPI struct per receive queue, enable NAPI, and use
> napi_gro_receive()
> Patch 2/ Use NAPI skb and napi_gro_frags(), exercise flow
> dissector, and allow custom skbs.
I'm happy with everything except the TUN_NAPI Kconfig knob
requirement.
Rebuilding something just to test things isn't going to fly very well.
Please make it secure somehow, enable this stuff by default.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists