lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM4PR0501MB2723F6F5A22955102CDC2886D4600@AM4PR0501MB2723.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:36:28 +0000
From:   Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>
To:     Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "davejwatson@...com" <davejwatson@...com>,
        "tom@...bertland.com" <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>,
        Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 5/5] tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure.

Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org> writes:

> The user should be aware of that they can't migrate the socket to another
> interface if they got hw offloaded. This is not the case for software offload.
> Thus I think the user has to opt in and it shouldn't be a heuristic until we can
> switch back to sw offload path.
> 
> Maybe change flowi_oif to sk_bound_dev_if and somwhow lock it against
> further changes if hw tls is in use?
> 

I'm not sure I follow.
We do set sk->sk_bound_dev_if to prevent further changes.

Do you recommend we enable TLS offload only if SO_BINDTODEVICE	
was previously used on that socket?
and prevent even users with CAP_NET_RAW from unbinding it?

I would rather avoid requiring CAP_NET_RAW to use TLS offload. 
But admittedly I'm not sure setting sk->sk_bound_dev_if 
without CAP_NET_RAW like we do is legit either.

Finally, the reason we made HW offload the default is that the user
can use sudo ethtool -K enp0s4 tls-hw-tx-offload off to opt out of HW offload
and we currently don't have anything equivalent for opting out of SW KTLS.

Thanks,
Ilya

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ