[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505914658.29839.94.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 06:37:38 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: Latest net-next from GIT panic
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 06:34 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Could you try this debug patch ?
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index f535779d9dc1dfe36934c2abba4e43d053ac5d6f..1eaa3553a724dc8c048f67b556337072d5addc82 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -3331,7 +3331,14 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void);
> */
> static inline void dev_put(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> - this_cpu_dec(*dev->pcpu_refcnt);
> + int __percpu *pref = READ_ONCE(dev->pcpu_refcnt);
> +
> + if (!pref) {
> + pr_err("no pcpu_refcnt on dev %p(%s) state %d dismantle %d\n",
> + dev, dev->name, dev->reg_state, dev->dismantle);
> + BUG();
> + }
> + this_cpu_dec(*pref);
> }
>
> /**
>
And since the console will be filled by stack trace, maybe instead of
BUG() use some infinite loop ?
for (;;)
cpu_relax();
Powered by blists - more mailing lists