netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Utilize dsa_slave_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871sn178qs.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:19:39 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Utilize dsa_slave_dev_check()

Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

> Instead of open coding the check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

If we do need to use it outside one day, we may think about renaming
netdev_uses_dsa() to netdev_is_dsa_master() and renaming
dsa_slave_dev_check() to netdev_is_dsa_slave().

In the meantime, looks good!

Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>