[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1505918451.29839.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:40:51 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: Latest net-next from GIT panic
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 16:03 +0200, Paweł Staszewski wrote:
> Nit much more after adding this patch
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=258529
>
This is why I suggested to replace the BUG() in another mail
So :
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index f535779d9dc1dfe36934c2abba4e43d053ac5d6f..220cd12456754876edf2d3ef13195e82d70d5c74 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -3331,7 +3331,15 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void);
*/
static inline void dev_put(struct net_device *dev)
{
- this_cpu_dec(*dev->pcpu_refcnt);
+ int __percpu *pref = READ_ONCE(dev->pcpu_refcnt);
+
+ if (!pref) {
+ pr_err("no pcpu_refcnt on dev %p(%s) state %d dismantle %d\n",
+ dev, dev->name, dev->reg_state, dev->dismantle);
+ for (;;)
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+ this_cpu_dec(*pref);
}
/**
Powered by blists - more mailing lists