netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet transmission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:11:53 +0200
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     levipearson@...il.com
Cc:     rcochran@...utronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        vinicius.gomes@...el.com, andre.guedes@...el.com,
        john.stultz@...aro.org, jesus.sanchez-palencia@...el.com,
        henrik@...tad.us, tglx@...utronix.de, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
        davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 0/6] Time based packet transmission

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:35:33AM -0600, levipearson@...il.com wrote:
> Anyway, I am wholly in favor of this proposal--in fact, it is very similar to
> a patch set I shared with Eric Mann and others at Intel in early Dec 2016 with
> the intention to get some early feedback before submitting here. I never heard
> back and got busy with other things. I only mention this since you said
> elsewhere that you got this idea from Eric Mann yourself, and I am curious
> whether Eric and I came up with it independently (which I would not be
> surprised at).

Well, I actually thought of placing the Tx time in a CMSG all by
myself, but later I found Eric's talk from 2012,

  https://linuxplumbers.ubicast.tv/videos/linux-network-enabling-requirements-for-audiovideo-bridging-avb/

and so I wanted to give him credit.

Thanks,
Richard