[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bd6834a-899a-b136-9886-249dadd5a6a6@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:29:55 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next v3] bridge: trigger RTM_NEWLINK when interface is
modified by bridge ioctl
On 9/21/17 11:20 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> this patch seems fine...but ideally I would have assumed
> netdev_upper_dev_unlink which
> is eventually called in both paths would generate the RTN_NEWLINK
> IFF_MASTER in response
> to the NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER notifier. If we add it there now, it might
> need some more fixes
> to not generate redundant notifications for the netlink case.
Agreed and it is another pandora's box
Powered by blists - more mailing lists