[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170921203608.GB30148@grante>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:36:08 -0500
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@...il.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net: macb: fail when there's no PHY
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:05:57PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> It looks like the macb driver still can't handle boards that don't
>> have a PHY. Is that correct?
>
> Not since:
>
> dacdbb4dfc1a1a1378df8ebc914d4fe82259ed46 ("net: macb: add fixed-link
> node support")
Yep, it's obvious now that I've got the diff in front of me.
Thanks!
[I just started working with device tree for the first time yesterday,
and I must say it's way better than the "old days" which required all
sorts of ugly to produce a kernel that could work on two slightly
different boards.]
--
Grant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists