netdev - [PATCH net 9/9] net/smc: no close wait in case of process shut down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170921071634.16883-10-ubraun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:16:34 +0200
From:   Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, jwi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
        raspl@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net 9/9] net/smc: no close wait in case of process shut down

Usually socket closing is delayed if there is still data available in
the send buffer to be transmitted. If a process is killed, the delay
should be avoided.

Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_close.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index 5201bc103bd8..f0d16fb825f7 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -174,15 +174,15 @@ int smc_close_active(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
 	struct smc_cdc_conn_state_flags *txflags =
 		&smc->conn.local_tx_ctrl.conn_state_flags;
-	long timeout = SMC_MAX_STREAM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
 	struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
 	struct sock *sk = &smc->sk;
 	int old_state;
+	long timeout;
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) &&
-	    !(current->flags & PF_EXITING))
-		timeout = sk->sk_lingertime;
+	timeout = current->flags & PF_EXITING ?
+		  0 : sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) ?
+		      sk->sk_lingertime : SMC_MAX_STREAM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
 
 again:
 	old_state = sk->sk_state;
@@ -413,13 +413,14 @@ void smc_close_sock_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
 int smc_close_shutdown_write(struct smc_sock *smc)
 {
 	struct smc_connection *conn = &smc->conn;
-	long timeout = SMC_MAX_STREAM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
 	struct sock *sk = &smc->sk;
 	int old_state;
+	long timeout;
 	int rc = 0;
 
-	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER))
-		timeout = sk->sk_lingertime;
+	timeout = current->flags & PF_EXITING ?
+		  0 : sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) ?
+		      sk->sk_lingertime : SMC_MAX_STREAM_WAIT_TIMEOUT;
 
 again:
 	old_state = sk->sk_state;
-- 
2.13.5